6 Comments

Very well said, Joe. Rather than pro-life, these religious zealots have a better claim to being pro-family. Not by today’s wide definition of family, of course, but as you implied, by the outmoded traditional patriarchal family. Forced birth fits neatly into that definition.

Expand full comment

Raised as a Catholic I understand the pro life issue. The fertilized egg is a potential person and therefore should not be destroyed. However, this presents a problem Sprott is alive album or alive and embryos fertilized eggs are alive. of course, the Catholic Church is a patriarchy, and therefore does not allow women the same status as men, and I therefore they do not take into account the suffering that women and die and pregnant women should have the ability to terminate the pregnancy had at a time before 24 weeks I agree with row hi, this question and that women should have more autonomy and be cared for equality with men they the idea of reference for life is very important, but it is it applies to to all aspects of adults and as well as nearly blind children, but the 20 but a 25 week status of the fetus is reasonable, and so far as these embryo I fetuses cannot survive. I had a good warm by themselves without extreme measures. And you are right that As a compassionate society, we should be concerned with all the homeless have a dad tried it on, and the poor hand women who have hard times during pregnancy. That’s why it’s a little ridiculous to get these drugs are causing abortions off the market thank you for your essay.

Expand full comment

Great analysis of "pro-life" issue as misogyny

Expand full comment